date: 2016-09-02
title: Importing .obj files, ugly polygons
game21-version: x-git-commit:b5d04d72e525e9b552647bc052395914da501da7

Importing .obj files, ugly polygons - 2016-09-02 - Entry 17 - TOGoS's Project Log

The .obj format (especially as exported by FreeCAD, which turns everything into polygons) is pretty simple, so I wrote a program to translate .obj files to the procedural shape language. The output is a lot more verbose than the input, so I'm thinking it might be nice to support the .obj format natively. In the meantime, this works.


Example of the polygon artifacts (I had to rotate the shape to a very specific angle to make them this bad; most of the time they look fine):

Without anti-aliasing
With anti-aliasing

Anti-aliasing seems to help a bit but doesn't really solve the problem.

Chapter 2

Some thoughts after horsing around trying to diagnose:

Backsides showing through and other weird shadows

Note that for this last example, both the light lines and the weird shadows go away completely (at least I was unable to rotate the cube into a position where I saw anything) when backsides are not drawn (which I could do in this case because this cube was not imported from a FreeCAD .obj).

Chapter 3

Another attempt at cleaning up the edges.

since the problem is that at extreme angles, pixels get plotted at extreme depths (and then cast shadows on others), why not just clamp the plotted depth within the possible depths given the polygon being plotted?

Keep in mind that the way I track depth is to track the depth of each corner of each pixel. It may have been better/simpler to just track the depth of the center and the x/y slope, but for now corner depths is how it works. When plotting a polygon, a pixel is included if its center (x, y) is within the polygon. So it could well be that one of the pixel's corners is outside the polygon, and logically should have an out-of-range depth value. And if all our calculations were mathematically perfect and we didn't have to deal with the realities of floating-point rounding errors that might work. But we do, so maybe a sanity check like this would help.

Turns out it does! But as a side-effect neighboring polygons making up a face had visible creases between them where their surface normals were off due to clamping. Solution is to only do the clamping when plotting polygons with high dz/dx or dz/dy.

Always clamping Z; notice the lines
Clamping Z only at high angles; no weird lines!

Still have the problem of backfaces showing in some places where they shouldn't, but hopefully that can be fixed by specifying polygons in a less goofy way, and anti-aliasing actually does mitigate that quite a bit.

Some random shape (I have updated entry 11 with the latest code to make this work) for your viewing pleasure: